Works matching IS 0920427X AND DT 2009 AND VI 23 AND IP 3
Results: 12
Perelman’s Audience Revisted: Towards the Construction of a New Type of Audience.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 409, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9156-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The New Rhetoric’s Inheritance. Argumentation and Discourse Analysis.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 313, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9154-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 301, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9150-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Concept of Scientific Fact: Perelman and Beyond.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 375, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9151-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Introduction.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
From Argument to Assertion.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 387, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9147-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 325, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9152-0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Manoeuvring Strategically with Praeteritio.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 339, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9153-z
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Can Perelman’s NR be Viewed as an Ethics of Discourse?
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 421, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9149-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Notion of Pseudo-Argument in Perelman’s Thought.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 351, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9146-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Who is the Addressee of Philosophical Argumentation?
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 397, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9155-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Perelman’s Pseudo-Argument as Applied to the Creationism Controversy.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2009, v. 23, n. 3, p. 361, doi. 10.1007/s10503-009-9148-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article