Reduction mammaplasty for symptomatic macromastia: which factors influence the post-operative outcome?

Radosa, Julia; Radosa, Marc; Baum, Sascha; Mavrova, Russalina; Camara, Oumar

Purpose: We evaluated the long-term results and patient's satisfaction in reduction mammaplasties for symptomatic mammary hypertrophy. Methods: From 2002 to 2008 a total of 92 women underwent bilateral mammaplasty for a symptomatic macromastia at our department. Three different surgical techniques for reduction mammaplasty were used (Bostwick, Stroembeck, Ribeiro). Patients were re-contacted in 2009 and asked to complete a self-assessment survey in order to asses their satisfaction with the post-operative symptom-relief and the overall outcome. Results: 90.5 % of all patients stated, that they would retrospectively re-opt for a reduction mammaplasty. Preoperative patients' age, BMI and severity of macromasty-related symptoms were found to be factors positively correlated with a high post-interventional satisfaction with the achieved symptom-relief and the overall outcome. No correlation was found between the amount of intra-operatively resected breast tissue and the post-operative patients' assessment. Patients' assessment regarding the achieved post-operative symptom relief was comparable for all three surgical techniques, however the overall outcome rating for both bi-pedicled approaches (Stroembeck and Ribeiro) was higher compared to the mono-pedicled Bostwick technique. Conclusions: Reduction mammaplasty for patients with a mammary hypertrophy and somatic symptoms could offer a causal and effective treatment. The predictive factors for a high patients' satisfaction identified in this study could become a valuable tool in the pre-operative patients counceling and their role should be further evaluated prospectively. The use of bi-pedicled surgical techniques seems to favor a high post-operative patients' assessment.

MAMMAPLASTY; PLASTIC surgery; HYPERTROPHY; PATIENT satisfaction; SURGICAL complications; OPERATIVE surgery; HEALTH outcome assessment

Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2013, Vol 287, Issue 4, p715

0932-0067

Academic Journal

10.1007/s00404-012-2620-z