Network meta-analysis of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for the treatment of chronic constipation in adults.

Deng, Xinxin; Liang, Cui; Zhou, Liying; Shang, Xue; Hui, Xu; Hou, Liangying; Wang, Yongsheng; Liu, Wendi; Liang, Shanshan; Yao, Liang; Yang, Kehu; Li, Xiuxia

Objective: To compare the outcomes associated with the use of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for the treatment of chronic constipation in adults. Methods: We searched eight electronic databases from database inception to July 11, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that report efficacy and safety for the treatment of chronic constipation. The risk of bias in the included RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane tool, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. The analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.0. Results: Out of the 37 RCTs, a total of 21 different types of interventions were reported, involving 3,903 patients. This NMA demonstrated that both prebiotics and synbiotics resulted in an increase in frequency of stool movements per week. Compared to placebo, lactulose (Mean difference [MD] = 3.39, 95% Confdence interval [CI] [1.13, 5.65], moderate certainty), mix2 (consisting of Lactulose and Bacillus coagulans) (MD = 3.63, 95% CI [1.37, 5.89], moderate certainty), mix6 (consisting of Lactulose and Bifidobacterium coagulans) (MD = 4.30, 95% CI [1.04, 7.54], low certainty), and mix7 (consisting of Lactulose, Bifidobacterium subtilis, and Enterococcus faecium) (MD = 4.58, 95% CI [1.35, 7.78], moderate certainty) exhibited a significant effect. Notably, mix7 demonstrated the highest probability of being the most effective intervention (94.8%). Furthermore, when compared to L. plantarum, four probiotics and two synbiotics showed significant advantages in the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) score. L. reuteri (MD = -13.74, 95% CI [-22.20, -4.66], very low certainty) exhibited a significant effect in improving the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) score. In terms of safety, there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in all adverse event analyses. Conclusions: Moderate to very low evidence supports the use of lactulose and synbiotics to increase the number of weekly stool movements in patients, particularly highlighting the significant impact of synbiotics in increasing the number of weekly stool movements in patients with constipation. The use of L. paracasei showed improvements in PAC-SYM scores, while L. reuteri demonstrated enhancements in PAC-QoL scores.

THERAPEUTIC use of probiotics; MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems; PATIENT safety; RESEARCH funding; PREBIOTICS; TREATMENT effectiveness; META-analysis; SYNBIOTICS; CHRONIC diseases; SYSTEMATIC reviews; MEDLINE; DRUG efficacy; DISACCHARIDES; MEDICAL databases; MEDICAL records; ACQUISITION of data; DEFECATION; ONLINE information services; CONSTIPATION; ADULTS

European Journal of Nutrition, 2024, Vol 63, Issue 6, p1999

1436-6207

Academic Journal

10.1007/s00394-024-03410-1