Does Patient Posture Affect the Ultrasound Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Turel, Friyan; Friedman, Talia; Dietz, Hans Peter; Braverman, Meirav; Kamisan Atan, Ixora

Objectives: Translabial ultrasound (US) imaging is an emerging method for the evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Normative data to date are limited to imaging in the supine position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of posture changes on US pelvic organ mobility. Methods: This work was a retrospective study of 175 women seen in a tertiary urogynecologic center for symptoms of lower urinary tract and pelvic floor dysfunction. All underwent a standardized interview, POP quantification prolapse assessment, and 4‐dimensional translabial US examination in supine and standing positions. Offline measurement of organ descent on the Valsalva maneuver was undertaken at a later date and was blinded against all other data. Results: The mean age was 58 (SD, 13.5; range, 17 to 89) years, with a mean body mass index of 29 (SD, 6.1; range, 18 to 53) kg/m2. In total, 58.9% (n = 103) presented with symptoms of prolapse. Clinically, 82.8% (n = 145) had substantial prolapse on the POP quantification assessment. On imaging, bladder, uterine, and rectal ampulla positions were significantly lower, and the hiatal area on the Valsalva maneuver was larger in the standing position (P < .03). On receiver operating characteristic statistics assessing correlations between POP symptoms and US pelvic organ descent, the area under the curve was higher in the standing position, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Measurements of organ descent and hiatal dimensions are generally higher in the standing position. However, they are not reflected in a stronger association between symptoms and organ descent. Hence, imaging in the standing position can be limited to those patients in whom a false‐negative assessment result is suspected.

PELVIC organ prolapse; GYNECOLOGY; SUPINE position; POSTURE; ULTRASONIC imaging

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2019, Vol 38, Issue 1, p233

0278-4297

Academic Journal

10.1002/jum.14688