Works matching Gleason grading system

Results: 2128
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5

    Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

    Published in:
    PLoS ONE, 2016, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146189
    By:
    • Faraj, Sheila F.;
    • Bezerra, Stephania M.;
    • Yousefi, Kasra;
    • Fedor, Helen;
    • Glavaris, Stephanie;
    • Han, Misop;
    • Partin, Alan W.;
    • Humphreys, Elizabeth;
    • Tosoian, Jeffrey;
    • Johnson, Michael H.;
    • Davicioni, Elai;
    • Trock, Bruce J.;
    • Schaeffer, Edward M.;
    • Ross, Ashley E.;
    • Netto, George J.
    Publication type:
    Article
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading to Higher Patterns in the Surgical Specimen. Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading to Higher Gleason Patterns in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who Have Been Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System

    Published in:
    Urologia Internationalis, 2016, v. 97, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1159/000445034
    By:
    • Porcaro, antonio Benito;
    • Siracusano, Salvatore;
    • De Luyk, Nicolò;
    • Corsi, Paolo;
    • Sebben, Marco;
    • Tafuri, alessandro;
    • Bizzotto, Leonardo;
    • Tamanini, Irene;
    • Inverardi, Davide;
    • Cerruto, Maria angela;
    • Martignoni, Guido;
    • Brunelli, Matteo;
    • artibani, Walter
    Publication type:
    Article
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    29
    30
    31
    32
    33
    34
    35

    Gleason grading: past, present and future.

    Published in:
    Histopathology, 2012, v. 60, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04003.x
    By:
    • Delahunt, Brett;
    • Miller, Rose J;
    • Srigley, John R;
    • Evans, Andrew J;
    • Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Publication type:
    Article
    36
    37
    38
    39
    40
    41

    Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.

    Published in:
    BJU International, 2014, v. 113, n. 3, p. 399, doi. 10.1111/bju.12424
    By:
    • Hansen, Jens;
    • Bianchi, Marco;
    • Sun, Maxine;
    • Rink, Michael;
    • Castiglione, Fabio;
    • Abdollah, Firas;
    • Steuber, Thomas;
    • Ahyai, Sascha A.;
    • Steurer, Stefan;
    • Göbel, Cosima;
    • Freschi, Massimo;
    • Montorsi, Francesco;
    • Shariat, Shahrokh F.;
    • Fisch, Margit;
    • Graefen, Markus;
    • Karakiewicz, Pierre I.;
    • Briganti, Alberto;
    • Chun, Felix K.‐H.
    Publication type:
    Article
    42
    43
    44
    45
    46
    47
    48

    MORFOLOŠKI PARAMETRI ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE.

    Published in:
    Medical Review / Medicinski Pregled, 2007, v. 60, n. 11/12, p. 549, doi. 10.2298/MPNS0712549T
    By:
    • Trivunić, Sandra;
    • Budakov, Pavle;
    • Vučković, Nada;
    • Živojinov, Mirjana
    Publication type:
    Article
    49
    50