Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1925 AND VI 13 AND IP 49
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 109, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134910
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 175, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134921
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 196, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134932
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 7, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134903
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 130, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134914
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 184, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134925
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 198, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134936
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 75, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134907
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 165, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134918
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 193, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134929
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 170, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134920
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 195, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134931
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134902
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 120, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134913
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 182, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134924
- Evans, Arthur;
- Cade, Stanford
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 198, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134935
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 58, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134906
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 163, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134917
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 190, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134928
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 199, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134939
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 194, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134930
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134901
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 200, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134941
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 117, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134912
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 180, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134923
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 197, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134934
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 50, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134905
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 158, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134916
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 189, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134927
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 199, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134938
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 93, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134909
- Shaw, A. F. Bernard;
- Smith, R. P.
- Article
32
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 200, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134940
- Article
33
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 113, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134911
- Article
34
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 178, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134922
- Article
35
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 197, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134933
- Article
36
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 39, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134904
- Article
37
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 144, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134915
- Article
38
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 187, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134926
- Article
39
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 199, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134937
- Article
40
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 78, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134908
- Article
41
- British Journal of Surgery, 1925, v. 13, n. 49, p. 169, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800134919
- Article