Association of Sex or Race With the Effect of Weight Loss on Physical Function: A Secondary Analysis of 8 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Beavers, Kristen M.; Neiberg, Rebecca H.; Kritchevsky, Stephen B.; Nicklas, Barbara J.; Kitzman, Dalane W.; Messier, Stephen P.; Rejeski, W. Jack; Ard, Jamy D.; Beavers, Daniel P.

This secondary analysis of 8 randomized clinical trials assesses whether stratification by sex and race is associated with meaningful differences in physical function response to weight loss among older adults. Key Points: Question: Is sex or race associated with the physical function response to a weight loss intervention among older adults? Findings: In this pooled secondary analysis of 1317 individuals participating in 8 randomized clinical trials of weight loss, including 397 (30.1%) men and 275 (20.9%) Black participants, greater weight loss–associated improvement in short physical performance battery score was observed in women vs men, and greater gait speed improvement in Black vs White participants. Meaning: These findings suggest that the benefits of weight loss on physical function in older adults differ by sex and race, underscoring the need to consider relevant biological variables in clinical research design. Importance: Consideration of differential treatment effects among subgroups in clinical trial research is a topic of increasing interest. This is an especially salient issue for weight loss trials. Objective: To determine whether stratification by sex and race is associated with meaningful differences in physical function response to weight loss among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pooled analysis used individual-level data from 8 completed randomized clinical trials of weight loss conducted at Wake Forest University or Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Data were housed within the Wake Forest Older Americans Independence Center data repository and provided complete exposure, outcome, and covariate information. Data were collected from November 1996 to March 30, 2017, and analyzed from August 15, 2019, to June 10, 2020. Exposures: Treatment arms within each study were collapsed into caloric restriction (CR [n = 734]) and non-CR (n = 583) categories based on whether caloric restriction was specified in the original study protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Objectively measured 6-month change in weight, fast-paced gait speed (meters per second), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score. Results: A total of 1317 adults (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [5.4] years; 920 [69.9%] female; 275 [20.9%] Black) with overweight or obesity (mean [SD] body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 33.9 [4.4]) were included at baseline. Six-month weight change achieved among those randomized to CR was −7.7% (95% CI, −8.3% to −7.2%), with no difference noted by sex; however, White individuals lost more weight than Black individuals assigned to CR (−9.0% [95% CI, −9.6% to −8.4%] vs −6.0% [95% CI, −6.9% to 5.2%]; P <.001), and all CR groups lost a significantly greater amount from baseline compared with non-CR groups (Black participants in CR vs non-CR groups, −5.3% [95% CI, −6.4% to −4.1%; P <.001]; White participants in CR vs non-CR groups, −7.2% [95% CI, −7.8% to −6.6%; P <.001]). Women experienced greater weight loss–associated improvement in SPPB score (CR group, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.52]; non-CR group, 0.08 [95% CI, −0.11 to 0.27]) compared with men (CR group, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.00-0.46]; non-CR group, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.09-0.58]; P =.03). Black participants experienced greater weight loss–associated improvement in gait speed (CR group, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.05-0.10] m/s; non-CR group, 0.02 [95% CI, −0.01 to 0.05] m/s) compared with White participants (CR group, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.06-0.09] m/s; non-CR group, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.04-0.08] m/s; P =.02). Conclusions and Relevance: The association of weight loss on physical function in older adults appears to differ by sex and race. These findings affirm the need to consider biological variables in clinical trial design.

COMPARATIVE studies; LIFE skills; HEALTH outcome assessment; RACE; SEX distribution; WEIGHT loss; SECONDARY analysis; TREATMENT effectiveness; PHYSICAL activity; DATA analysis software; DESCRIPTIVE statistics

JAMA Network Open, 2020, Vol 3, Issue 8, pe2014631

2574-3805

Academic Journal

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14631