Found: 59
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
OP110 Survey Of Health Technology Assessment Evaluation Strategies For Patient And Public Involvement.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Abstract
EVALUATION OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT INITIATIVES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
EVIDENCE INFORMED DECISION MAKING: THE USE OF “COLLOQUIAL EVIDENCE” AT NICE.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2015, v. 31, n. 3, p. 138, doi. 10.1017/S0266462314000749
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011, v. 27, n. 4, p. 391, doi. 10.1017/S0266462311000481
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The PRIME project: developing a patient evidence-base.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 2010, v. 13, n. 3, p. 312, doi. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00590.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 2007, v. 10, n. 2, p. 173, doi. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patient expectations and health-related quality of life.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 1999, v. 2, n. 2, p. 93, doi. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00046.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Investigation of the ways in which patients’ reports of their satisfaction with healthcare are constructed.
- Published in:
- Sociology of Health & Illness, 2004, v. 26, n. 2, p. 159, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00385.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Nurses' role in liaising between patients and service providers.
- Published in:
- Nursing Management - UK, 2011, v. 18, n. 4, p. 24, doi. 10.7748/nm2011.07.18.4.24.c8591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2022, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/S0266462321001732
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2021, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/S0266462321001732
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patient and public involvement in Health Technology Assessment: a new dawn?
- Published in:
- 2021
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
Mind the evidence gap: the use of patient-based evidence to create "complete HTA" in the twenty-first century.
- Published in:
- 2021
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
EVALUATION OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT INITIATIVES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2017, v. 33, n. 6, p. 715, doi. 10.1017/S0266462317000976
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Accessing the user’s perspective.
- Published in:
- Health & Social Care in the Community, 2000, v. 8, n. 6, p. 417, doi. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00267.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Correction to: Developing a Framework for Public Involvement in Mathematical and Economic Modelling: Bringing New Dynamism to Vaccination Policy Recommendations.
- Published in:
- 2021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Correction Notice
Developing a Framework for Public Involvement in Mathematical and Economic Modelling: Bringing New Dynamism to Vaccination Policy Recommendations.
- Published in:
- Patient, 2021, v. 14, n. 4, p. 435, doi. 10.1007/s40271-020-00476-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Using PROMs in Healthcare: Who Should Be in the Driving Seat-Policy Makers, Health Professionals, Methodologists or Patients?
- Published in:
- Patient, 2016, v. 9, n. 6, p. 495, doi. 10.1007/s40271-016-0197-5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities.
- Published in:
- Patient, 2014, v. 7, n. 4, p. 387, doi. 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Correction to: Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.
- Published in:
- 2022
- By:
- Publication type:
- Correction Notice
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.
- Published in:
- Applied Health Economics & Health Policy, 2022, v. 20, n. 2, p. 213, doi. 10.1007/s40258-021-00704-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patient and public involvement in health services and health research: A brief overview of evidence, policy and activity.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
Patient beliefs and perceptions play a crucial role in the decision-making process when managing a meniscal tear. A qualitative systematic review of the literature.
- Published in:
- European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2022, v. 32, n. 4, p. 619, doi. 10.1007/s00590-021-03019-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Meniscal tears are more common than previously identified, however, less than a quarter of people with a tear undergo arthroscopy.
- Published in:
- Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, v. 29, n. 11, p. 3892, doi. 10.1007/s00167-021-06458-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
- Published in:
- MDM Policy & Practice, 2022, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1177/23814683211061097
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
- Published in:
- European Journal of Health Economics, 2022, v. 23, n. 8, p. 1309, doi. 10.1007/s10198-021-01426-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Establishing the values for patient engagement (PE) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) research: an international, multiple-stakeholder perspective.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium.
- Published in:
- Quality of Life Research, 2015, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1069, doi. 10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review.
- Published in:
- Quality of Life Research, 2012, v. 21, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1007/s11136-011-9921-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Patients’ evaluations of the quality of care: influencing factors and the importance of engagement.
- Published in:
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (Wiley-Blackwell), 2005, v. 49, n. 5, p. 530, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03326.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination strategies for adolescent girls and boys in the UK.
- Published in:
- 2019
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
- Published in:
- 2022
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
"About sixty per cent I want to do it": Health researchers' attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)—A qualitative interview study.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 2019, v. 22, n. 4, p. 721, doi. 10.1111/hex.12883
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 2017, v. 20, n. 5, p. 836, doi. 10.1111/hex.12519
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The development of service user-led recommendations for health and social care services on leaving hospital with memory loss or dementia - the SHARED study.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 2017, v. 20, n. 3, p. 495, doi. 10.1111/hex.12477
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.
- Published in:
- Health Expectations, 2014, v. 17, n. 5, p. 637, doi. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Consumer involvement in health research: a UK scoping and survey.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2014, v. 38, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1111/ijcs.12072
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2011, v. 35, n. 6, p. 628, doi. 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01020.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Co-producing an online patient public community research hub: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of national institute for health research (NIHR) research champions in England.
- Published in:
- Research Involvement & Engagement, 2024, v. 10, p. 1, doi. 10.1186/s40900-024-00556-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Commentary: Advocating for patient and public involvement and engagement in health economic evaluation.
- Published in:
- Research Involvement & Engagement, 2023, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1186/s40900-023-00444-3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Co-production: a kind revolution.
- Published in:
- 2022
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
The Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines.
- Published in:
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2014, v. 26, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.1093/intqhc/mzu003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.
- Published in:
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2012, v. 24, n. 1, p. 28, doi. 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base.
- Published in:
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008, v. 20, n. 6, p. 373, doi. 10.1093/intqhc/mzn044
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Meeting the patient partnership agenda: the challenge for health care workers.
- Published in:
- 2004
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
Meeting the patient partnership agenda: the challenge for health care workers.
- Published in:
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004, v. 16, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1093/intqhc/mzh014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Developing the infrastructure for patient review in academic journals.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.
- Published in:
- PharmacoEconomics, 2022, v. 40, n. 6, p. 601, doi. 10.1007/s40273-021-01112-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.
- Published in:
- BMC Public Health, 2022, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1186/s12889-021-12491-0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article