Found: 7
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
Comparison of response rates, intake estimates, and preferences between the National Cancer Institute's Automated Self‐Administered 24‐Hour Recall and interviewer‐administered Automated Multiple Pass Method recalls (36.7).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.36.7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Accuracy of portion size reporting in the Automated Self‐Administered 24‐hour recall (ASA24) compared to interviewer‐administered recalls (36.6).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.36.6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comparison of dietary supplement intake reporting between the Automated Self‐Administered 24‐Hour Recall (ASA24) and Automated Multiple Pass Method (AMPM) recalls (245.2).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.245.2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Influence of editing free text responses on nutrient and food group estimates from the Automated Self‐Administered 24‐hour dietary recall (ASA24) (1022.7).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.1022.7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Pilot Test of an Online ASA24 Training With EFNEP Educators.
- Published in:
- SAGE Open, 2019, v. 9, n. 2, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1177/2158244019844074
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comparison of a dietary record using reported portion size versus standard portion size for assessing nutrient intake.
- Published in:
- Public Health Nutrition, 2000, v. 3, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.1017/S1368980000000185
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, v. 181, n. 12, p. 970, doi. 10.1093/aje/kwu467
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article