We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Do bisphosphonates affect bone healing? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Authors
Deting Xue; Fangcai Li; Gang Chen; Shigui Yan; Zhijun Pan
- Abstract
Background Whether bisphosphonates affect indirect bone healing is still unclear. Method We carried out a comprehensive search strategy. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological qualities and extracted outcome data. Analysis was performed with RevMan 5.2. Results Eight eligible randomized controlled trials with 2,508 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that no statistically significant differences were founded in indirect bone healing in short time (within 3 months) (relative risk (RR) 1.40, relative the control group; 95% CI 0.36 to 5.49) and in long-term (more than 12 months) postoperation (RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02) between bisphosphonates infusion groups and control groups. There were no statistically significant differences of indirect bone healing between early and delay bisphosphonates administration groups. Bisphosphonates infusion after lumbar infusion surgery could promote bone healing and shorten fusion time in 6 months postoperation (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66). Conclusion There was no clinically detectable delay to fracture healing via external callus formation following bisphosphonates treatment. Considering the benefit aspects of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis treatment, we recommend bisphosphonates infusion after fracture fixation surgery and lumbar fusion surgery.
- Subjects
DIPHOSPHONATES; BONES; DATABASES; MEDICAL information storage &; retrieval systems; LUMBAR vertebrae; MEDLINE; META-analysis; SPINAL fusion; WOUND healing; RANDOMIZED controlled trials
- Publication
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research, 2014, Vol 9, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
1749-799X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1186/1749-799X-9-45