We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Clinical decision tool for CRT-P vs. CRT-D implantation: Findings from PROSE-ICD.
- Authors
Nauffal, Victor; Zhang, Yiyi; Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan; Blasco-Colmenares, Elena; Rickard, John; Marine, Joseph E.; Butcher, Barbara; Norgard, Sanaz; Dickfeld, Timm-Michael; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.; Guallar, Eliseo; Tomaselli, Gordon F.; Cheng, Alan
- Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices reduce mortality through pacing-induced cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Whether certain factors can predict if patients will benefit more from implantation of CRT pacemakers (CRT-P) or CRT defibrillators (CRT-D) remains unclear. Methods and results: We followed 305 primary prevention CRT-D recipients for the two primary outcomes of HF hospitalization and ICD therapy for VAs. Serum biomarkers, electrocardiographic and clinical variables were collected prior to implant. Multivariable analysis using Cox-proportional hazards model was used to fit the final models. Among 282 patients with follow-up outcome data, 75 (26.6%) were hospitalized for HF and 31 (11%) received appropriate ICD therapy. Independent predictors of HF hospitalization were atrial fibrillation (HR = 1.8 (1.1,2.9)), NYHA class III/IV (HR = 2.2 (1.3,3.6)), ejection fraction <20% (HR = 1.7 (1.1,2.7)), HS-IL6 >4.03pg/ml (HR = 1.7 (1.1,2.9)) and hemoglobin (<12g/dl) (HR = 2.2 (1.3,3.6)). Independent predictors of appropriate therapy included BUN >20mg/dL (HR = 3.0 (1.3,7.1)), HS-CRP >9.42mg/L (HR = 2.3 (1.1,4.7)), no beta blocker therapy (HR = 3.2 (1.4,7.1)) and hematocrit ≥38% (HR = 2.7 (1.03,7.0)). Patients with 0–1 risk factors for appropriate therapy (IR 1 per 100 person-years) and ≥3 risk factors for HF hospitalization (IR 23 per 100-person-years) were more likely to die prior to receiving an appropriate ICD therapy. Conclusions: Clinical and biomarker data can risk stratify CRT patients for HF progression and VAs. These findings may help characterize subgroups of patients that may benefit more from the use of CRT-P vs. CRT-D systems. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov
- Subjects
CARDIAC pacing; HEART valve prosthesis implantation; VENTRICULAR arrhythmia; MEDICAL decision making; BIOMARKERS; MULTIVARIATE analysis; THERAPEUTICS
- Publication
PLoS ONE, 2017, Vol 12, Issue 4, p1
- ISSN
1932-6203
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0175205