We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Authors
Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Yawen Li; Yun Wang; Bin Cheng; Wang, Jinlin; Wu, Xiaoli; Yin, Ping; Guo, Qiaozhen; Hou, Wei; Li, Yawen; Wang, Yun; Cheng, Bin
- Abstract
<bold>Background: </bold>Linear endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) allows the visualization, identification, and characterization of the extent of lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and adjacent structures. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) facilitates a more accurate diagnosis of mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and pancreatic lesions through the collection of the cytological material under direct visualization. Recent reports suggest that histological samples can be obtained by EUS-FNA with a reverse, bevel-tipped needle (the ProCore needle) to collect the core samples (fine needle biopsy, FNB), thereby adding a new dimension to the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Certain neoplasms, such as lymphoma and stromal tumors, can be assessed by EUS-FNB to confirm the diagnosis. Here, we aimed to carry out a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial to compare EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA.<bold>Methods/design: </bold>A total of 408 patients will be enrolled from five endoscopic centers. Patients will be divided into two groups: (1) group A, which is the EUS regular needle group (EUS-FNA) and (2) group B, which is the EUS ProCore needle group (EUS-FNB). Patients in group A will be examined with a 22G EchoTip Ultra needle, and patients in group B, with a 22G EchoTip ProCore needle. For all included patients, four EUS-guided passes will be made in each lesion. In the first and second pass, a slow-pull suction method of the stylet will be done. The third and fourth pass will use manual suction of 5 cc. The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic yield of malignancy by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB.<bold>Discussion: </bold>The trial will compare samples obtained by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for the diagnostic yield of solid lesions. The efficacy of these two sampling methods will be assessed on various lesions, which may provide insights into developing practice guidelines for their future indications.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>Clinical Trials.gov, NCT02327065 .
- Subjects
NEEDLE biopsy; ULTRASONIC imaging; GASTROINTESTINAL system; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; TUMORS; COMPARATIVE studies; LONGITUDINAL method; RESEARCH methodology; MEDICAL cooperation; RESEARCH protocols; PROGNOSIS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH evaluation; GASTROINTESTINAL tumors; EVALUATION research; PREDICTIVE tests; ENDOSCOPIC gastrointestinal surgery
- Publication
Trials, 2016, Vol 17, p1
- ISSN
1745-6215
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1186/s13063-016-1316-2