We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
The Bulletproof Glass Effect: Unintended Consequences of Privacy Notices.
- Authors
Brough, Aaron R.; Norton, David A.; Sciarappa, Shannon L.; John, Leslie K.
- Abstract
Drawing from a content analysis of publicly traded companies' privacy notices, a survey of managers, a field study, and five online experiments, this research investigates how consumers respond to privacy notices. A privacy notice, by placing legally enforceable limits on a firm's data practices, communicating safeguards, and signaling transparency, might be expected to promote confidence that personal data will not be misused. Indeed, most managers expected a privacy notice to make customers feel more secure (Study 1). Yet, consistent with the analogy that bulletproof glass can increase feelings of vulnerability despite the protection offered, formal privacy notices undermined consumer trust and decreased purchase interest even when they emphasized objective protection (Studies 2, 3, and 5) or omitted any mention of potentially concerning data practices (Study 6). These unintended consequences did not occur, however, when consumers had an a priori reason to be distrustful (Study 4) or when benevolence cues were added to privacy notices (Studies 5 and 6). Finally, Study 7 showed that both the presence and conspicuous absence of privacy information are sufficient to trigger decreased purchase intent. Together, these results provide actionable guidance to managers on how to effectively convey privacy information (without hurting purchase interest).
- Subjects
PRIVACY; CONSUMER behavior; TRUST; ORGANIZATIONAL transparency; PSYCHOLOGICAL vulnerability; PUBLIC companies; DATA security; SOCIAL contract; MANAGEMENT; MEDIATION
- Publication
Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 2022, Vol 59, Issue 4, p739
- ISSN
0022-2437
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1177/00222437211069093