We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Evaluating the optimum number of biopsies to assess histological inflammation in ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort study.
- Authors
Battat, Robert; Vande Casteele, Niels; Pai, Rish K.; Wang, Zhongya; Zou, Guangyong; McDonald, John W. D.; Duijvestein, Marjolijn; Jeyarajah, Jenny; Parker, Claire E.; Van Viegen, Tanja; Nelson, Sigrid A.; Boland, Brigid S.; Singh, Siddharth; Dulai, Parambir S.; Valasek, Mark A.; Feagan, Brian G.; Jairath, Vipul; Sandborn, William J.
- Abstract
Summary: Background: The optimal ulcerative colitis biopsy protocol is unclear. Aim: To evaluate the number of biopsies required to accurately assess microscopic disease activity in ulcerative colitis Methods: Biopsies from patients with ≥4 rectosigmoid samples, and clinical and endoscopic data, were retrospectively obtained from a prospective biobank. Histology and endoscopic videos were read blindly. A 4‐biopsy Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) reference score, consisting of the worst item‐level ratings from four biopsies, was compared to 1‐, 2‐ and 3‐biopsy estimates. Agreement was determined using bivariate errors‐in‐variable regression analysis (acceptance interval: ±8.25). Endoscopic activity and disease location subgroup analyses were also performed. Results: Forty‐six patients had ≥4 rectosigmoid biopsies available (N = 287). The 2‐biopsy (tolerance interval: −7.66, 4.79) and 3‐biopsy (tolerance interval: −4.86, 3.46) RHI scores demonstrated acceptable agreement with 4‐biopsy scores. One‐biopsy scores demonstrated unacceptable agreement (tolerance interval: −13.99, 7.78). Mean RHI scores using the 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐biopsy approaches were similar (6.1 ± 9.6 P = 0.36; 6.8 ± 10.5, P = 0.7; 7.5 ± 11.2), whereas the 1‐biopsy estimate was lower (4.4 ± 8.1, P = 0.06). Histological remission rates were identical for the 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐biopsy methods (65.2%, P = 1.0). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that three biopsies were required in patients with endoscopically active disease. Sampling additional colonic locations yielded lower histological remission rates compared to rectosigmoid sampling alone (33.3% vs 61.9%, P = 0.1). Conclusions: A minimum of two — conservatively, three — biopsies are required to reliably assess disease activity in a single colonic segment using the RHI. Further studies are needed of endoscopically active patients and sampling locations. These results have implications for biopsy strategies in clinical trials and practice.
- Subjects
ULCERATIVE colitis; COHORT analysis; INFLAMMATION; BIOPSY; RETROSPECTIVE studies; INFLAMMATORY bowel diseases
- Publication
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2020, Vol 52, Issue 10, p1574
- ISSN
0269-2813
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/apt.16083