We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
I. REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS.
- Authors
Curran, Kenneth J.
- Abstract
The article presents information on legal developments related to the regulation of monopolistic methods. In a case between the U.S. government and Diebold Inc., the Supreme Court declared the acquisition of a firm on the verge of failure is not contrary to the anti-merger section of the Clayton Act. In another case, Harold J. Silver brought a suit for damages and injunctive relief against the New York Stock Exchange charging that the Exchange had violated the Sherman Act when it caused some of its members to discontinue private wire services to him. The case involves the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which sets forth divided responsibility for policing the stock exchanges of the country between the Securities Exchange Commission and the exchanges themselves.
- Subjects
UNITED States; MONOPOLY laws; MONOPOLISTIC competition; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); TRADE regulation; MARKETING laws; MERGERS &; acquisitions; ADMINISTRATIVE acts; COMMERCIAL law; DIEBOLD Nixdorf Inc.; UNITED States. Supreme Court; UNITED States. Securities &; Exchange Commission
- Publication
Journal of Marketing, 1962, Vol 26, Issue 4, p83
- ISSN
0022-2429
- Publication type
Article