We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
RAGING WITH THE TRUTH: Condemnation and Concealment in the Poetry of Blake and Hill.
- Authors
Merriman, Emily Taylor
- Abstract
An analysis of Geoffrey Hill's lyric poem about William Blake illuminates the relations between art, prophecy, and imperial politics across more than two centuries. Hill's poem responds to David V. Erdman's argument that Blake was resolutely, if ineffectually and sometimes secretly, opposed to war. It also establishes Hill's own cryptic but definite resistance to contemporary war and warmongers, while it mourns poetry's public powerlessness to halt the violent competition for material resources. Ignored by the majority, poetry fails to bring about the ethical social change that poets often envision. The layering of perspectives (Hill the poet and scholar writing about Erdman the scholar, who is explicating Blake the poet and artist) allows for a multidimensional interpretation of the role of poets and prophetic poetry. Despite their fury at society's deafness and greed, and frustration at their own incapacities, poets—because if they are great poets, they are prophets, too—continue to speak to their audiences about the problems of this world and about the better worlds that can be imagined. Hill's text obliquely teaches how the small success of a great poem can provide a minor note of consolation as it objects to terror and tyranny.
- Subjects
HILL, Geoffrey, 1932-2016; POETRY (Literary form); BLAKE, William, 1757-1827; ART; PROPHECY; IMPERIALISM; ERDMAN, David V.; CHAUVINISM &; jingoism; POETS; AVARICE
- Publication
Journal of Religious Ethics, 2009, Vol 37, Issue 1, p83
- ISSN
0384-9694
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00376.x