We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
How to respond to inappropriate questions in job interviews: Personal and social consequences of truth‐telling, deflection and confrontation.
- Authors
Kahalon, Rotem; Ullrich, Johannes; Becker, Julia C.
- Abstract
Parents, especially mothers, and young women without children, face a subtle threat in job interviews: being asked inappropriate questions about parental status. In three vignette experiments (N = 760), we compared personal (perceived likability and likelihood of being hired) and social consequences (perceived chances that the interviewer will ask the inappropriate question again) of different response strategies. Results suggest that deflection (i.e., responding with another question) is a superior strategy at the personal level, as it increases the perceived chances to be hired in comparison to truth‐telling (Study 1) and confrontation (Studies 1–3) without hurting likability (Study 1). Confrontation (i.e., saying that the question is inappropriate) is a superior strategy at the social level, decreasing the perceived probability that the interviewer will keep asking inappropriate questions in comparison to deflection (Studies 2 and 3) and truth‐telling (Study 3). No gender differences were apparent. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
- Subjects
PARENTS; MATHEMATICAL variables; DATA analysis; RESEARCH funding; EQUALITY; SEX distribution; PSYCHOLOGY of women; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; EMPLOYMENT interviewing; PSYCHOLOGY of mothers; COMMUNICATION; ANALYSIS of variance; STATISTICS; CASE studies; CONFIDENCE intervals; DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL stigma
- Publication
European Journal of Social Psychology, 2024, Vol 54, Issue 4, p989
- ISSN
0046-2772
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/ejsp.3062