We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: A systematic overview of systematic reviews.
- Authors
Anderson, Laura J; Schnipper, Jeff L; Nuckols, Teryl K; Shane, Rita; Le, Michael M; Robbins, Karen; Pevnick, Joshua M; group, Members of the PHARM-DC
- Abstract
Purpose To evaluate and summarize published evidence from systematic reviews examining medication reconciliation. Methods MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for English-language systematic reviews published from January 2004 to March 2019. Reviewers independently extracted information and scored review quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. For reviews with AMSTAR scores above 7, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess evidence quality, with evidence summarized and conclusions compared across reviews. Results Eleven reviews met the inclusion criteria, 5 of which used meta-analytic pooling. Most systematic reviews included primary studies of comprehensive bundled interventions that featured medication reconciliation as a central component. Reviews largely focused on transitions into and out of hospital settings. Five reviews focused exclusively on pharmacist-led interventions. Of the 5 reviews that considered all types of medication discrepancies, 3 reviews found very low-quality evidence that interventions reduced medication discrepancies. Neither of the 2 reviews that examined clinically significant medication discrepancies found any intervention effect. Of the 5 reviews that examined healthcare utilization outcomes, only 1 found any intervention effect, and that finding was based on low- to very low-quality evidence. Four reviews considered clinical outcomes, but none found any intervention effect. Conclusion An overview of systematic reviews of medication reconciliation interventions found 9 high-quality systematic reviews. A minority of those reviews' conclusions were consistent with medication reconciliation alone having a measurable impact, and such conclusions were almost all based on very low-quality evidence.
- Subjects
INFORMATION storage &; retrieval systems; MEDICAL databases; MEDICAL care use; MEDLINE; PATIENT safety; SYSTEMATIC reviews; MEDICATION reconciliation
- Publication
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2019, Vol 76, Issue 24, p2028
- ISSN
1079-2082
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/ajhp/zxz236