We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Clinical outcomes and complications after biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 3673 cases.
- Authors
Park, Don Y.; Upfill-Brown, Alexander; Curtin, Nora; Hamad, Christopher D.; Shah, Akash; Kwon, Brian; Kim, Yong H.; Heo, Dong Hwa; Park, Cheol Woong; Sheppard, William L.
- Abstract
Purpose: Current literature suggests that biportal spinal endoscopy is safe and effective in treating lumbar spine pathology such as lumbar disc herniation, lumbar stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. No prior study has investigated the postoperative outcomes or complication profile of the technique as a whole. This study serves as the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of biportal spinal endoscopy in the lumbar spine. Methods: A PubMed literature search provided over 100 studies. 42 papers were reviewed and 3673 cases were identified with average follow-up time of 12.5 months. Preoperative diagnoses consisted of acute disc herniation (1098), lumbar stenosis (2432), and degenerative spondylolisthesis (229). Demographics, operative details, complications, and perioperative outcome and satisfaction scores were analyzed. Results: Average age was 61.32 years, 48% male. 2402 decompressions, 1056 discectomies, and 261 transforaminal lumbar Interbody fusions (TLIFs) were performed. Surgery was performed on 4376 lumbar levels, with L4-5 being most common(61.3%). 290 total complications occurred, 2.23% durotomies, 1.29% inadequate decompressions, 3.79% epidural hematomas, and < 1% transient nerve root injuries, infections, and iatrogenic instability. Significant improvement in VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, ODI, and Macnab Scores were seen across the cohort. Conclusion: Biportal spinal endoscopy is a novel method to address pathology in the lumbar spine with direct visualization through an endoscopic approach. Complications are comparable to previously published rates. Clinical outcomes demonstrate effectiveness. Prospective studies are required to assess the efficacy of the technique as compared to traditional techniques. This study demonstrates that the technique can be successful in the lumbar spine.
- Subjects
SPINAL surgery; ENDOSCOPIC surgery; LUMBAR vertebrae; TREATMENT effectiveness; SURGICAL complications; MINIMALLY invasive procedures; NERVOUS system injuries
- Publication
European Spine Journal, 2023, Vol 32, Issue 8, p2637
- ISSN
0940-6719
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00586-023-07701-9