We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
SWINGING AND DINING DO NOT MIX: WHY SEXUAL ACTIVITY CAN NOT BE AN ACCESSORY USE OR A VESTED RIGHT IN A RESTAURANT IN PENNSYLVANIA.
- Authors
Farkas, Samuel E.
- Abstract
The article discusses the case MAJ Entertainment Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment wherein the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ruled that sexual intercourse by restaurant customers is not considered an accessory use to such facility and that the firm has no vested right in the use of Club Kama Sutra. Judge Dan Pellegrini argued that the showing of sexual activity at the club made such facility a cabaret. Also explained are the two-part test created by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania concerning the issue of accessory use.
- Subjects
PENNSYLVANIA; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); MAJ Entertainment Inc.; ZONING boards; SEXUAL intercourse; RESTAURANTS; CONSUMERS; PELLEGRINI, Dan
- Publication
Widener Law Journal, 2010, Vol 19, Issue 2, p671
- ISSN
1548-4076
- Publication type
Article