We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Perelman’s Pseudo-Argument as Applied to the Creationism Controversy.
- Authors
Haarscher, Guy
- Abstract
If you want to challenge or at least weaken the adhesion to a system of values, you can basically adopt two radically opposed rhetorical strategies. Either you will attack the system in a frontal way: for instance, fundamentalists or fascists deny any validity to democratic values and human rights. Or you will pretend to argue from within the system (by saying that you accept some of its basic premises), while subtly distorting the process of reasoning in order to get to your conclusions. If the audience is naïve or poorly informed, you will be able to defend positions that are fundamentally at odds with liberal-democratic values while seeming to argue from inside the system. I would like to show how such a process of “perverse” translation works in the context of the Darwinism/Creationism “controversy”. The attacks on the teaching of evolutionary biology began approximately one century ago. The way Creationists have argued and changed several times their rhetorical strategies seems very interesting to me, in that it exemplifies an important contemporary phenomenon, which I call “perverse translation” or “the wolf in the sheepfold”.
- Subjects
BIOLOGICAL evolution; CREATIONISM; INTELLIGENT design (Teleology); SCIENCE education; PSEUDOCODE (Computer program language)
- Publication
Argumentation, 2009, Vol 23, Issue 3, p361
- ISSN
0920-427X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10503-009-9148-9