We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Nasal mucosal versus gastrointestinal absorption of nasally administered cocaine.
- Authors
Fattinger, K.; Benowitz, N. L.; Jones, R. T.; Verotta, D.
- Abstract
Objective: Several xenobiotics, including cocaine, are dosed by the nasal route for systemic effects. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare cocaine input into the systemic circulation after oral and nasal dosing, and to determine the relevance of local absorption through the nasal mucosa. Methods: Cocaine was administered to healthy volunteers through the intravenous, oral, and nasal routes. Cocaine serum concentrations were measured at frequent intervals. From these data, the gastrointestinal, nasal, and nasal mucosa input rate functions were determined using nonparametric, subject-specific population deconvolution. Results: After oral dosing, cocaine input into systemic circulation increased slowly and peaked around 45 min after ingestion. The median systemic bioavailability after oral dosing was 33%. After nasal dosing, drug input was substantial even during the first minute and showed two peaks at 10 min and 45 min after ingestion. Since the second peak after nasal dosing closely resembled drug input after oral administration, we hypothesized that, after nasal administration, a part of the dose is swallowed and thereafter absorbed gastrointestinally. The data from the sessions with nasal cocaine administration were reanalyzed assuming the same shape for gastrointestinal drug input as after oral dosing. The fraction absorbed through the nasal mucosa was estimated to be 19% (95% CI: 11–26%). The fraction absorbed through the nasal mucosa contributed 31% (95% CI: 23–37%) of total systemic cocaine exposure. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the main reason addicts prefer nasal to oral cocaine dosing is faster absorption, enhancing the subjective effects rather than higher bioavailability.
- Subjects
XENOBIOTICS; COCAINE; BIOAVAILABILITY; NASAL mucosa; CLINICAL pharmacology; MEDICAL research
- Publication
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000, Vol 56, Issue 4, p305
- ISSN
0031-6970
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s002280000147