We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
- Authors
Kalata, Stanley; Thumma, Jyothi R.; Norton, Edward C.; Dimick, Justin B.; Sheetz, Kyle H.
- Abstract
Key Points: Question: What are the utilization rates and comparative safety outcomes of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy across the United States? Findings: This cohort study of claims data for Medicare beneficiaries identified 1 026 088 who underwent a cholecystectomy from 2010 through 2019. Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy rates increased 37-fold, and this procedure was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (0.7% vs 0.2%). Meaning: In the absence of other advantages over an already minimally invasive procedure, the findings of this study call into question the role of the robotic platform for cholecystectomy. Importance: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is rapidly being adopted into practice, partly based on the belief that it offers specific technical and safety advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery. Whether robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is safer than laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains unclear. Objective: To determine the uptake of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and to analyze its comparative safety vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used Medicare administrative claims data for nonfederal acute care hospitals from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Participants included 1 026 088 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 66 to 99 years of age who underwent cholecystectomy with continuous Medicare coverage for 3 months before and 12 months after surgery. Data were analyzed August 17, 2022, to June 1, 2023. Exposure: Surgical technique used to perform cholecystectomy: robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic approaches. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of bile duct injury requiring definitive surgical reconstruction within 1 year after cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes were composite outcome of bile duct injury requiring less-invasive postoperative surgical or endoscopic biliary interventions, and overall incidence of 30-day complications. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed adjusting for patient factors and clustered within hospital referral regions. An instrumental variable analysis was performed, leveraging regional variation in the adoption of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy within hospital referral regions over time, to account for potential confounding from unmeasured differences between treatment groups. Results: A total of 1 026 088 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [12.0] years; 53.3% women) were included in the study. The use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy increased 37-fold from 211 of 147 341 patients (0.1%) in 2010 to 6507 of 125 211 patients (5.2%) in 2019. Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury necessitating a definitive operative repair within 1 year (0.7% vs 0.2%; relative risk [RR], 3.16 [95% CI, 2.57-3.75]). Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was also associated with a higher rate of postoperative biliary interventions, such as endoscopic stenting (7.4% vs 6.0%; RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.16-1.33]). There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complication rates between the 2 procedures. The instrumental variable analysis, which was designed to account for potential unmeasured differences in treatment groups, also showed that robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury (0.4% vs 0.2%; RR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.14-2.63]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study's finding of significantly higher rates of bile duct injury with robotic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggests that the utility of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy should be reconsidered, given the existence of an already minimally invasive, predictably safe laparoscopic approach. This cohort study compares the rates and safety outcomes of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a nationally representative population of older adults.
- Publication
JAMA Surgery, 2023, Vol 158, Issue 12, p1303
- ISSN
2168-6254
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389