We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Prostate cancer grading, time to go back to the future.
- Authors
Egevad, Lars; Delahunt, Brett; Bostwick, David G.; Cheng, Liang; Evans, Andrew J.; Gianduzzo, Troy; Graefen, Markus; Hugosson, Jonas; Kench, James G.; Leite, Katia R.M.; Oxley, Jon; Sauter, Guido; Srigley, John R.; Stattin, Pär; Tsuzuki, Toyonori; Yaxley, John; Samaratunga, Hemamali
- Abstract
Abbreviation ISUP International Society of Urological Pathology In November 2014, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) convened a consensus meeting in Chicago, Illinois, USA to consider grading criteria for prostatic adenocarcinoma [1]. While cribriform cancer used to be included in either Gleason pattern 3 or 4, depending on the size and shape of the glands, the ISUP 2014 revision considers all cribriform cancer to be Gleason pattern 4, or even 5 if comedonecrosis is present [19]. An explanation for this increasing interest may be that the Gleason inflation that was fueled by the ISUP 2005 consensus recommendations has pushed a considerable number of cancers from Gleason score 6 to 7 [21]. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system.
- Subjects
PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE cancer; MEDICAL personnel; CORE needle biopsy; MALE reproductive organs; GLEASON grading system
- Publication
BJU International, 2021, Vol 127, Issue 2, p165
- ISSN
1464-4096
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/bju.15298