We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
The Existential Sources of Phenomenology: Heidegger on Formal Indication.
- Authors
Burch, Matthew I.
- Abstract
This article contributes to the contemporary debate regarding the young Heidegger's method of formal indication. Theodore Kisiel argues that this method constitutes a radical break with Husserl-a rejection of phenomenological reflection that paves the way to the non-reflective approach of the Beiträge. Against this view, Steven Crowell argues that formal indication is continuous with Husserlian phenomenology-a refinement of phenomenological reflection that reveals its existential sources. I evaluate this debate and adduce further considerations in favor of Crowell's view. To do so, I analyze the young Heidegger's account of phenomenological communication and argue that it further reflects the continuity that Crowell identifies: as he does with reflection, Heidegger refines Husserl's account of phenomenological communication and sheds light on its existential sources.
- Subjects
PHENOMENOLOGY; COMMUNICATION; CONTINUITY; DEBATE; CRITICAL thinking
- Publication
European Journal of Philosophy, 2013, Vol 21, Issue 2, p258
- ISSN
0966-8373
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00446.x