We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Parasites and Post‐Truth Climate.
- Authors
Taylor‐Neu, Robyn Holly
- Abstract
This article argues that the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), an exemplary climate change skeptical organization, attains persuasive power by striking up a parasitic relation to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and associated discourse genres. Drawing upon theories of citationality and genre, along with conceptual accounts of the parasite (Serres 2013 [1980]; Nakassis 2013; Kockelman 2010, 2017), I construe parasitism as an asymmetric structure of relation that recurs across various sites and scales. As parasitic actors, corporate climate change skeptics like the NIPCC imitate and incorporate host institutions and discourses in order to mine scientific authority while undermining scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change. At the same time, this relation between organizations and their respective discourse genres generates informatic noise or static (French parasite) within established channels of popular science communication. In the case examined here, the NIPCC interrupts an economy of expertise within which the UN‐sponsored IPCC holds a privileged position. An uncanny resemblance between the two organizations, between parasite and host, erodes the latter's claims to authority, just as a counterfeit coin erodes public trust in the currency it mimics.
- Subjects
INTERGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change; EFFECT of human beings on climate change; SCIENTIFIC communication; CLIMATE change; CLIMATOLOGY; PARASITES; INTERRUPTION (Psychology)
- Publication
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2020, Vol 30, Issue 1, p4
- ISSN
1055-1360
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/jola.12257