We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
A Right to Break the Law? On the Political Function and Moral Grounds of Civil Disobedience.
- Authors
Trovik, Johan Andreas
- Abstract
Do citizens of liberal democratic states have a moral right to engage in civil disobedience? Famously, Joseph Raz argued that they do not. In this article, I defend his argument against some recent challenges, but show how it is tied to a particular model of civil disobedience. On this model, the purpose of civil disobedience is to protest and prevent particularly egregious violations of justice. A moral right to civil disobedience can be grounded on a different model, where the function of civil disobedience is to identify and counterbalance democratic deficits. Against the widespread tendency amongst theorists of civil disobedience to want to defend civil disobedience as the exercise of a moral right, however, I do not then argue for the adoption of the democratic model. Whilst I acknowledge the reasons behind wanting a rights-based defence, and concede that different kinds of civil disobedience might have to be defended on different grounds, I sound a note of caution. The meta-theoretical relation between moral grounds and political function uncovered in this article works both ways. It should make theorists more mindful of the self-understanding to which a rights-based moral defence of civil disobedience commits protesters.
- Subjects
DEMOCRACY; CIVIL disobedience; PUBLIC demonstrations; RAZ, Joseph; ETHICS
- Publication
Res Publica (13564765), 2023, Vol 29, Issue 3, p385
- ISSN
1356-4765
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11158-022-09578-9