We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Magnetic controlled growth rods versus conventional growing rod systems in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a cost comparison.
- Authors
Rolton, Daniel; Richards, Joanna; Nnadi, Colin
- Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the cost differences between a conventional growth rod system (CGRS) and magnetic controlled growth rods (MCGR) in treating early onset scoliosis (EOS) over a projected 5 year period. We hypothesise that the high initial outlay for MCGR would be recouped from fewer admissions and surgical procedures over the lifetime of the implant. Methods: The costs of all aspects of treatment for 14 patients undergoing conversion from CGRS to MGRS were collected over a 3 year period. The costs of all aspects of each treatment including clinic visits, hospital stay, theatre and complications were calculated and projected over the lifetime of each device. Results: The initial outlay for insertion for MCGR was £12,913 more than the CGRS. There were significant cost savings for each lengthening which projected over the 5 year lifetime amounted to a cost saving of over £8,000 per patient. Conclusions: Magnetic controlled growth rods reduce the need for multiple invasive procedures in the management of EOS. The implant has a significant projected cost saving in comparison to CGRS.
- Subjects
SCOLIOSIS; SPINE abnormalities; INPATIENT care; HUMAN abnormalities; SURGERY
- Publication
European Spine Journal, 2015, Vol 24, Issue 7, p1457
- ISSN
0940-6719
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00586-014-3699-7