We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Required sampling intensity for community analyses of intertidal infauna to detect a mechanical disturbance.
- Authors
Gerwing, Travis G.; Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen; Davies, Morgan M.; Juanes, Francis; Dudas, Sarah E.
- Abstract
In coastal ecosystems, infaunal (animals living within the sediment) invertebrates are used to study and monitor disturbances. However, it is an open question as to the minimal required sampling intensity to detect that a disturbance has influenced such communities. As such, we implemented a manipulative experiment using an infaunal community with a known response (community composition and population abundances) to a mechanical disturbance (sediment scour), to determine the minimum sampling intensity required to detect differences in the infaunal community. Statistically significant differences (α = 0.05) between the infaunal community of the disturbed and reference replicates were observed in case studies consisting of 99 (4 samples per m2) to 5 (0.2 samples per m2) samples per treatment. Below 5 samples, the known statistical and biological difference was undetectable. However, at least 10 samples per treatment (0.4 samples per m2) were required for the observed infaunal community to be within 93% similarity of our most accurate assessments of the infaunal community. These findings suggest that studies attempting to identify disturbances may require a minimal sampling intensity equivalent to 0.2 samples per m2, while studies attempting to determine how the infaunal community varies with disturbances may require 0.4 samples per m2. These potential minimal required sampling intensities will be of use in the theoretical exploration of disturbances, as well as in applied conservation, restoration, and monitoring projects.
- Subjects
BRITISH Columbia; SOCIAL influence; OPEN-ended questions
- Publication
Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2022, Vol 194, Issue 12, p1
- ISSN
0167-6369
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10661-022-10610-x