We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Racial Inequities in the Control of Hypertension and the Explanatory Role of Residential Segregation: a Decomposition Analysis in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).
- Authors
Guimarães, Joanna M. N.; Jackson, John W.; Barber, Sharrelle; Griep, Rosane H.; da Fonseca, Maria de J. M.; Camelo, Lidyane V.; Barreto, Sandhi M.; Schmidt, Maria Inês; Duncan, Bruce B.; Cardoso, Leticia de O.; Pereira, Alexandre C.; Chor, Dora
- Abstract
The mechanisms underlying racial inequities in uncontrolled hypertension have been limited to individual factors. We investigated racial inequities in uncontrolled hypertension and the explanatory role of economic segregation in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). All 3897 baseline participants with hypertension (2008–2010) were included. Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg), self-reported race (White/Brown/Black people), and neighborhood economic segregation (low/medium/high) were analyzed cross-sectionally. We used decomposition analysis, which describes how much a disparity would change (disparity reduction; explained portion) and remain (disparity residual; unexplained portion) upon removing racial differences in economic segregation (i.e., if Black people had the distribution of segregation of White people, how much we would expect uncontrolled hypertension to decrease among Black people). Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension (39.0%, 52.6%, and 54.2% for White, Brown, and Black participants, respectively) remained higher for Black and Brown vs White participants, regardless of economic segregation. Uncontrolled hypertension showed a dose–response pattern with increasing segregation levels for White but not for Black and Brown participants. After adjusting for age, gender, education, and study center, unexplained portion (disparity residual) of race on uncontrolled hypertension was 18.2% (95% CI 13.4%; 22.9%) for Black vs White participants and 12.6% (8.2%; 17.1%) for Brown vs White participants. However, explained portion (disparity reduction) through economic segregation was − 2.1% (− 5.1%; 1.3%) for Black vs White and 0.5% (− 1.7%; 2.8%) for Brown vs White participants. Although uncontrolled hypertension was greater for Black and Brown vs White people, racial inequities in uncontrolled hypertension were not explained by economic segregation.
- Subjects
BRAZIL; RESIDENTIAL segregation; CROSS-sectional method; SECONDARY analysis; RESEARCH funding; HYPERTENSION; SOCIOECONOMIC factors; SEX distribution; AGE distribution; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; WHITE people; CHI-squared test; RACE; BLACK people; METROPOLITAN areas; DIASTOLIC blood pressure; ANALYSIS of variance; HEALTH equity; CONFIDENCE intervals; SYSTOLIC blood pressure; EDUCATIONAL attainment
- Publication
Journal of Racial & Ethnic Health Disparities, 2024, Vol 11, Issue 2, p1024
- ISSN
2197-3792
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s40615-023-01582-w