We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Cost Analysis of Early versus Delayed Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Case-Matched Study.
- Authors
Robertson, Jason; Linkhorn, Hannah; Vather, Ryash; Jaung, Rebekah; Bissett, Ian P.
- Abstract
Background/Aims: The optimal timing for the closure of loop ileostomies remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether early ileostomy closure (EC) (<2 weeks post-formation) results in significant healthcare savings as against late closure (LC). Methods: Patients with available cost data that underwent EC between January 2008 and December 2012 were compared against matched patients undergoing LC during the same period. Direct hospital costs for the two groups were compared. Results: There were 42 EC patients and 61 LC patients. EC patients had significantly less ileostomy-related complications (p < 0.001) and hospital readmissions (p < 0.001). Operative time (p < 0.001) and operative cost (p = 0.002) were also both significantly less in the EC group. Community nursing costs favoured the LC group (p = 0.047). The EC group had an increased post-closure wound infection rate (p = 0.02). The mean total direct cost per patient was NZD 13,724 (SD NZD 3,736) for EC and NZD 16,728 (SD NZD 8,028) for LC. Representing an average costs saving of NZD 3,004 per patient favouring EC (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Although EC increases the post-closure wound infection rate, EC reduces ileostomy complications, hospital readmissions and operative costs resulting in significant healthcare savings. In order to improve patient outcomes and make EC even more cost effective, efforts should be taken to reduce wound infections. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Subjects
ILEOSTOMY; SURGICAL site infection prevention; SURGICAL complications; PATIENT readmissions; MEDICAL care costs; HEALTH outcome assessment
- Publication
Digestive Surgery, 2015, Vol 32, Issue 3, p166
- ISSN
0253-4886
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1159/000375324