We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
HETEROGENEITY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MODELS LINKING RELATIONSHIPS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES.
- Authors
Uchino, Bert N.; Holt-Lunstad, Julianne; Smith, Timothy W.; Bloor, Lindsey
- Abstract
We examined the utility of a broad conceptual framework that highlights the natural heterogeneity that exists in social networks. From this framework, we contrasted the positivity, negativity, outcome-specific, and ambivalence models in predicting psychological distress and well-being in 209 men and women using a cross-sectional design. Results revealed that the numbers of supportive and aversive ties were independent predictors of psychological distress and well-being. However, supportive ties were stronger predictors of psychological distress than aversive ties. The number of ambivalent ties was also an independent predictor of psychological distress compared to aversive ties. Consistent with our framework, failure to methodologically separate the co-occurring postivity and negativity in social relationships obscured associations between relationships and psychological outcomes. Conceptual and methodological implications of this general framework for the study of social networks and mental health are discussed.
- Subjects
HETEROGENEITY; SOCIAL networks; PSYCHOLOGICAL distress; MENTAL health; EMOTIONS
- Publication
Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 2004, Vol 23, Issue 2, p123
- ISSN
0736-7236
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1521/jscp.23.2.123.31014