We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparison of sedation between the endoscopy room and operation room during endoscopic submucosal dissection for neoplasms in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
- Authors
Daisuke Yamaguchi; Naoko Yamaguchi; Yuki Takeuchi; Takahiro Yukimoto; Kei Ikeda; Kosuke Matsumoto; Rikako Kinoshita; Saori Kamachi; Kyosuke Sugiyama; Tomohito Morisaki; Keisuke Ario; Hisako Yoshida; Ryo Katsuki; Seiji Tsunada; Kazuma Fujimoto; Yamaguchi, Daisuke; Yamaguchi, Naoko; Takeuchi, Yuki; Yukimoto, Takahiro; Ikeda, Kei
- Abstract
<bold>Background: </bold>The present study was performed to compare the safety of sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the endoscopy room versus operation room.<bold>Methods: </bold>In total, 297 patients with gastrointestinal tumors who underwent ESD from January 2011 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent ESD in the endoscopy room without propofol (Group E) versus operation room with propofol (Group O). The patient, tumor, and procedure characteristics; adverse events; and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups.<bold>Results: </bold>The patient and tumor characteristics, including age (73.6 ± 8.2 vs. 72.5 ± 9.1 years), comorbidities, and tumor size and histology, were not different between Groups E and O. The ESD procedure time was comparable between Groups E and O (105.4 ± 70.4 vs. 106.5 ± 64.4 min), and the anesthesia time was equivalent (138.3 ± 78.1 vs. 148.4 ± 68.8 min). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. During the ESD procedure, desaturation occurred significantly more often in Group E than O (12.9% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.021, odds ratio: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.17-14.4). The recovery time after ESD was significantly longer in Group E than O (180 (100-360) vs. 90 (0-180) min, P < 0.001).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A decreased desaturation rate and shorter recovery time after ESD were the advantages of sedation in the operation room with propofol compared with sedation in the endoscopy room. These findings warrant further exploration of the advantages of safe and effective ESD for upper gastrointestinal neoplasms in the operation room.
- Subjects
ENDOSCOPY; TUMORS; GASTROINTESTINAL diseases; LARYNGOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC surgery
- Publication
BMC Gastroenterology, 2017, Vol 17, p1
- ISSN
1471-230X
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1186/s12876-017-0692-8