We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
- Authors
Dorman, Michael F.; Liss, Julie; Wang, Shuai; Berisha, Visar; Ludwig, Cimarron; Cook Natale, Sarah
- Abstract
Purpose: Five experiments probed auditory-visual (AV) understanding of sentences by users of cochlear implants (CIs). Method: Sentence material was presented in auditory (A), visual (V), and AV test conditions to listeners with normal hearing and CI users. Results: (a) Most CI users report that most of the time, they have access to both A and V information when listening to speech. (b) CI users did not achieve better scores on a task of speechreading than did listeners with normal hearing. (c) Sentences that are easy to speechread provided 12 percentage points more gain to speech understanding than did sentences that were difficult. (d) Ease of speechreading for sentences is related to phrase familiarity. (e) Users of bimodal CIs benefit from low-frequency acoustic hearing even when V cues are available, and a second CI adds to the benefit of a single CI when V cues are available. (f) V information facilitates lexical segmentation by improving the recognition of the number of syllables produced and the relative strength of these syllables. Conclusions: Our data are consistent with the view that V information improves CI users’ ability to identify syllables in the acoustic stream and to recognize their relative juxtaposed strengths. Enhanced syllable resolution allows better identification of word onsets, which, when combined with place-of-articulation information from visible consonants, improves lexical access.
- Subjects
AUDITORY perception; COCHLEAR implants; COMPARATIVE studies; PHONETICS; PROBABILITY theory; QUESTIONNAIRES; READING; RESEARCH funding; SPEECH evaluation; SURVEYS; VISUAL perception; STRUCTURAL equation modeling; ONE-way analysis of variance
- Publication
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 2016, Vol 59, Issue 6, p1505
- ISSN
1092-4388
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0312