We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Why Modernist Claims for Autonomy Matter.
- Authors
Altieri, Charles
- Abstract
Historicist critics of modernism characterize modernist claims about abstraction, impersonality, and autonomy as escapist denials of a plausible realism. This essay uses examples from the visual arts—Pissarro, Cezanne, and Malevich—to argue that modernist autonomy is not an escape from nature but a recasting of art's relation to the world. The dream of autonomy derives from artists who, rather than picturing the world from a position of external authority, imagine that they have to work from the inside out. Instead of presenting pictures of discreet entities or objects, they render situations characterized by mutually dependent and mutually determining elements. "Autonomy" names a principle by which artists claim the right to redefine every element of their heritage by balancing energies and tensions that are exemplified in the mutual involvement of authorship, audience, work, and world. A literary example of such autonomy, and of the value of autonomy, is Wallace Stevens's "Nomad Exquisite."
- Subjects
POLITICAL autonomy; MODERNISM (Art); NATURE (Aesthetics); ABSTRACT thought; NATURE in literature; STEVENS, Wallace, 1879-1955; 20TH century (Literary period); MODERNISM (Literary period)
- Publication
Journal of Modern Literature, 2009, Vol 32, Issue 3, p1
- ISSN
0022-281X
- Publication type
Essay
- DOI
10.2979/JML.2009.32.3.1