We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
The Role of Defendant Race and Racially Charged Media in Canadian Mock Juror Decision Making.
- Authors
McManus, Laura; Maeder, Evelyn; Yamamoto, Susan
- Abstract
This study examined the influence of defendant race and race salience (manipulated via racially charged media) on Canadian mock jurors' judgements. Two hundred ten jury-eligible Canadian online participants read a racially charged (general or specific to the defendant's race) or neutral article followed by a trial transcript that involved dangerous operation of a motor vehicle and impaired driving charges against a White, Black, or Indigenous defendant. Diverging from previous findings, this study did not find effects of defendant race or race salience on verdict judgements or causal attributions. However, when race is not a central feature of the case, making race salient outside the trial may increase levels of racial bias for some mock jurors. When the defendant was Black, a race-specific article appeared to backfire, producing the harshest sentencing recommendation compared to race-neutral and general race articles. Conversely, for the Indigenous defendant, any mention of race produced harsher recommended sentences relative to no mention of race. Results do not seem to parallel those found in U.S. race-salience studies. Rather, this specific race-salience technique may be detrimental to a minority defendant's case in a Canadian context.
- Subjects
MOCK jurors; DEFENDANTS; RACE discrimination in justice administration; AGENDA setting theory (Communication); DECISION making in law; JUDICIAL process; RACISM; PSYCHOLOGY
- Publication
Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2018, Vol 60, Issue 2, p266
- ISSN
1707-7753
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.3138/cjccj.2017.0035.r1