We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Primary Malignancy Is an Independent Determinant of Morbidity and Mortality after Liver Resection.
- Authors
FROMER, MARC W.; GAUGHAN, JOHN P.; ATABEK, UMUR M.; SPITZ, FRANCIS R.
- Abstract
Although outcomes after liver resection have improved, there remains considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality with these procedures. Studies suggest a primary liver cancer diagnosis is associated with poorer outcomes, but the extent to which this is attributable to a higher degree of hepatic dysfunction is unclear. To better delineate this, we performed a matched pair analysis of primary versus metastatic malignancies using a national database. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2013) was analyzed to select elective liver resections. Diagnoses were sorted as follows: 1) primary liver cancers and 2) metastatic neoplasms. A literature review identified factors known to impact hepatectomy outcomes; these variables were evaluated by a univariate analysis. The most predictive factors were used to create similar groups from each diagnosis category via propensity matching. Multivariate regression was used to validate results in the wider study population. Outcomes were compared using chi-squared test and Fisher exact test. Matched groups of 4838 patients were similar by all variables, including indicators of liver function. A number of major complications were significantly more prevalent with a primary diagnosis; overall major morbidity rates in the metastatic and primary groups were 29.3 versus 41.6 per cent, respectively. The mortality rate for primary neoplasms was 4.6 per cent (vs 1.6%); this represents a risk of death nearly three-times greater (95% confidence interval = 2.20-3.81, P < 0.0001) in cancers of hepatic origin. Hepatectomy carries substantially higher perioperative risk when performed for primary liver cancers, independent of hepatic function and resection extent. This knowledge will help to improve treatment planning, patient education, and resource allocation in oncologic liver resection.
- Subjects
UNITED States; LIVER cancer; DISEASES; CANCER; TUMORS; HEPATECTOMY; LIVER tumors; HEALTH outcome assessment; PROBABILITY theory; QUALITY assurance; SURGICAL complications; RETROSPECTIVE studies
- Publication
American Surgeon, 2017, Vol 83, Issue 5, p436
- ISSN
0003-1348
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1177/000313481708300515