We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Molecular subgrouping of medulloblastoma in pediatric population using the NanoString assay and comparison with immunohistochemistry methods.
- Authors
Kim, Joo Whan; Park, Sung-Hye; Choi, Seung Ah; Kim, Seung-Ki; Koh, Eun Jung; Won, Jae-Kyung; Nam, Sun Mo; Phi, Ji Hoon
- Abstract
<bold>Purpose: </bold>Molecular subgrouping of medulloblastoma has become important due to its impact on risk group stratification. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been widely used but it has innate limitations. The NanoString assay has been proposed as an alternative method. This study aims to present the characteristics of medulloblastoma subgrouped by the NanoString assay and to compare the subgrouping results with the IHC method.<bold>Methods: </bold>Pediatric patients with histological diagnosis of medulloblastoma who underwent surgery from 2007 to 2021 were included. Clinical characteristics, pathological findings were reviewed. Molecular subgrouping was performed by IHC and by NanoString nCounter Elements TagSets assay. Test for concordance between two methods was made.<bold>Results: </bold>Among a total of 101 patients analyzed, subgrouping using the NanoString assay resulted in 14 (13.8%) WNT, 20 (19.8%) SHH, 18 (17.8%) Group 3, and 39 (38.6%) Group 4 subgroup cases. Survival analysis revealed the following from best to worse prognosis: WNT, Group 4, SHH, and Group 3. In SHH subgroup the large cell/anaplastic histology was present in 30% of cases. Seventy-one cases were analyzed for concordance between NanoString and IHC. Cohen's kappa value indicated moderate agreement but identification of Groups 3 and 4 with IHC using NPR3 and KCNA1 markers exhibited poor results.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The NanoString assay of Korean medulloblastoma patients revealed a more aggressive clinical course in the SHH subgroup which may be explained by a higher proportion of large cell/anaplastic histology being present in this subgroup. IHC did not distinguish Group 3 or 4 accurately. The NanoString assay may represent a good alternative method for practical use in the clinical field.
- Subjects
CHILD patients; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; PEDIATRIC surgery; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry); BRAIN tumor diagnosis; GLIOMAS; RESEARCH funding; PROGNOSIS; BRAIN tumors; IMPACT of Event Scale; ARTHRITIS Impact Measurement Scales
- Publication
BMC Cancer, 2022, Vol 22, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
1471-2407
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1186/s12885-022-10328-6