We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Contestaţie în anul are întemeiată pe dispoziţiile art. 318 t eza a II-a C. pr. civ. Interpretarea noţiunii de omisiune din gre şeală".
- Abstract
One cannot discuss about an error "of omission" of investigating a ground of appeal, for the purpose of art. 318 the second sentence of the Code of civil procedure, in case the court of appeal upheld the enforceability of the provisions of art. 23 of the Regulation (EC) 44/2001, considering that, under these circumstances, the separate examination of the scope of art. 3 and art. 5 of the same regulation is needless, as the enforcement of these last legal provisions is removed according to the argument a contrario.
- Subjects
STATUTORY interpretation; LAW enforcement; CRIMINAL omission; CIVIL procedure; MISTAKE (Criminal law); APPELLATE courts
- Publication
Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2014, Issue 2, p54
- ISSN
1844-6450
- Publication type
Article