We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Are women attending a midwifery-led birthing center at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?
- Authors
O'Leary, Bobby D.; Ciprike, Vineta
- Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: In recent years there has been renewed interest in midwifery-led care for women, with studies reporting similar neonatal outcomes despite lower rates of intervention in midwifery-led birthing centers. Research into obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) in these birthing centers is scarce. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of OASI after spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women in consultant or midwifery-led units over a ten-year period. Methods: All spontaneous vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women from 2008 to 2017 were analyzed in a single-center retrospective study. Women who had neuraxial analgesia were excluded. The primary endpoint was OASI. Labor characteristics in both groups were compared, and a multiple regression model was created. Results: During the study period, there were 3260 spontaneous vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women; 75.7% (2467/3260) delivered in the consultant-led unit and 24.3% (793/3260) in the midwifery-led unit (MLU). Women delivering in the MLU had a greater risk of anal sphincter injury than those delivering in the CLU (4.9% [39/793] vs 2.5% [62/2467], OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.32 – 3.01). Significant risk factors that increased the risk of OASI on regression analysis were birthweight and delivery in the midwifery-led unit. Conclusions: Women delivering in the midwifery-led unit appear to be at double the risk of OASI when compared to those delivering in the consultant-led unit. These results are in contrast to previous studies in midwifery-led centers. This difference may be site-specific and further research is required before these results form part of patient counseling.
- Subjects
ANUS; BIRTHING centers; OLD age pensions; REGRESSION analysis; WOUNDS &; injuries
- Publication
International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, Vol 31, Issue 3, p583
- ISSN
0937-3462
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00192-019-04218-y