We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Should Clinicians Set Limits on Reproductive Autonomy?
- Authors
King, Louise P.
- Abstract
As a gynecologic surgeon with a focus on infertility, I frequently hold complex discussions with patients, exploring with them the risks and benefits of surgical options. In the past, we physicians may have expected our patients to simply defer to our expertise and choose from the options we presented. In our contemporary era, however, patients frequently request options not favored by their physicians and even some they've found themselves online. In reproductive endocrinology and infertility, the range of options that may be offered or that patients may themselves seek out is continuously widening. Physicians certainly seek to find the option that will result in the best outcome for their patients, but the information to guide us in achieving the best outcome can be vague or conflicting. Add to this the financial and emotional pressures bearing on patients seeking assisted reproduction. In this essay, I explore the extent to which clinicians in reproductive medicine should follow patient requests with which they disagree or instead try to persuade the patient to do something else or simply refuse outright to meet the request. And if persuasion is to be used, what would be legitimate methods? Clearly, coercion is unacceptable, but the line between persuasion and coercion can be elusive. At what point can or should clinicians resist such requests-and to what degree?
- Subjects
BIOETHICS; HUMAN reproductive technology; PERSUASION (Rhetoric); PHYSICIAN-patient relations; GOVERNMENT regulation; OCCUPATIONAL roles; PATIENT autonomy; ETHICS
- Publication
Hastings Center Report, 2017, Vol 47, pS50
- ISSN
0093-0334
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/hast.796