We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Fluctuating arch symmetry: a comparison of two methods of assessment - applicability and efficiency.
- Authors
Rezende PUCCIARELLI, Maria Giulia; Passucci AMBROSIO, Eloá Cristina; Marchini OLIVEIRA, Thaís; SFORZA, Chiarella; de MENEZES, Márcio; SOARES, Simone
- Abstract
Introduction: Symmetry is balance, some correspondence in the size, form, and arrangements of parts on opposite sides of a plane, line, or point. The opposite of this concept is asymmetry, or imbalance. Objective: This retrospective study compared two methods for assessing arch symmetry with linear measurements based on triangles, to determine their applicability and efficiency. Methods: Two groups were enrolled: children (n=20) and adults (n=20), and the arch symmetry was assessed from linear measurements. Method 1: the incisor-canine (INC), canine-molar (CM), and incisor-molar (INM) distances (paired t-test and Pearson correlation). Method 2: a mathematical equation between the cusps measurements of the canines and the distobuccal of the first molars leading to result 1 (t-test for one sample and bootstrapping analysis). Dental casts were digitized and analyzed using a software program. The Bland-Altman test compared the methods (a=0.05). Results: The Bland-Altman test revealed concordance between the methods; however, separately the results were different: In method 1, the mandibular arch did not demonstrate correlation (children, INC r=0.33; CM r=0.45; INM r=0.51; adults, CM r=0.46; INM r=0.35), however, the maxilla revealed a strong correlation in children and a strong/moderate correlation in adults. In method 2, both arches were symmetrical (p>0.05). Conclusion: Method 1 may be appropriate during orthodontic treatment, and method 2 may be indicated for final treatment. These methods are useful; however, only method 1 identified the side of asymmetry. The methods can contribute to future studies in syndromic and non-syndromic patients, before and after orthognathic surgeries and orthodontic treatment, comparing results.
- Subjects
DENTAL arch; PEARSON correlation (Statistics); DENTAL casting; CORRECTIVE orthodontics; LENGTH measurement; ORTHOGNATHIC surgery
- Publication
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 2024, Vol 29, Issue 4, p1
- ISSN
2176-9451
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2423265.oar