We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness.
- Authors
Rehani, Madan M.; Melick, Emily R.; Alvi, Raza M.; Doda Khera, Ruhani; Batool-Anwar, Salma; Neilan, Tomas G.; Bettmann, Michael
- Abstract
<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine percent of patients without malignancy and ≤ 40 years of age with high cumulative radiation doses through recurrent CT exams and assess imaging appropriateness.<bold>Methods: </bold>From the cohort of patients who received cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv over a 5-year period, a sub-set was identified with non-malignant disease. The top 50 clinical indications leading to multiple CTs were determined. Clinical decision support (CDS) system scores were analyzed using a widely adopted standard of 1-3 (red) as "not usually appropriate," 4-6 (yellow) "may or may not be appropriate," and 7-9 (green) "usually appropriate." Clinicians reviewed patient records to assess compliance with appropriate use criteria (AUC).<bold>Results: </bold>9.6% of patients in our series were with non-malignant conditions and 1.4% with age ≤ 40 years. CDS scores (rounded) were 2% red, 38% yellow, 27% green, and 33% unscored CTs. Clinical society guidelines for CT exams, wherever available, were followed in 87.5 to 100% of cases. AUCs were not available for several clinical indications as also referral guidelines for serial CT imaging. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age ≤ 40 years require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years but the radiation risk creates concern. There is a fair number of conditions for which AUC are not available. Suggested solutions include development of CT scanners with lesser radiation dose and further development of appropriateness criteria.<bold>Key Points: </bold>We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age group 0-40 years and with non-malignant diagnosis require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease. Imaging guidelines and appropriateness use criteria are not available for many conditions. Wherever available, they are for initial work-up and diagnosis and there is a lack of guidance on serial CT imaging.
- Subjects
MEDICAL records; CLINICAL indications; EXAMINATIONS; AGE groups; RADIATION doses
- Publication
European Radiology, 2020, Vol 30, Issue 4, p1839
- ISSN
0938-7994
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1007/s00330-019-06551-8