Found: 7
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
Comparison of a dietary record using reported portion size versus standard portion size for assessing nutrient intake.
- Published in:
- Public Health Nutrition, 2000, v. 3, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.1017/S1368980000000185
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Pilot Test of an Online ASA24 Training With EFNEP Educators.
- Published in:
- SAGE Open, 2019, v. 9, n. 2, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1177/2158244019844074
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, v. 181, n. 12, p. 970, doi. 10.1093/aje/kwu467
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Accuracy of portion size reporting in the Automated Self‐Administered 24‐hour recall (ASA24) compared to interviewer‐administered recalls (36.6).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.36.6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comparison of response rates, intake estimates, and preferences between the National Cancer Institute's Automated Self‐Administered 24‐Hour Recall and interviewer‐administered Automated Multiple Pass Method recalls (36.7).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.36.7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comparison of dietary supplement intake reporting between the Automated Self‐Administered 24‐Hour Recall (ASA24) and Automated Multiple Pass Method (AMPM) recalls (245.2).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.245.2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Influence of editing free text responses on nutrient and food group estimates from the Automated Self‐Administered 24‐hour dietary recall (ASA24) (1022.7).
- Published in:
- FASEB Journal, 2014, v. 28, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.1022.7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article