We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the use of microneedling alone versus chemical peeling alone versus a combination of microneedling and chemical peeling in the treatment of atrophic post-acne scars. An assessment of clinical effectiveness and patients' quality-of-life.
- Authors
Pakla-Misiur, Agata; Grochowiec, Marcelina; Lesiak, Aleksandra; Bednarski, Igor A.
- Abstract
Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common, chronic disease. One of the most commonly encountered complications of acne is permanent atrophic scarring. Treatment of atrophic scars includes fillers, dermabrasion, laser resurfacing, microneedling and peelings and it is often difficult to treat. In our double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), we investigated the synergistic effect of microneedling with the application of trichloroacetic acid, kojic acid and hydrogen peroxide in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Aim: To assess the clinical effectiveness and patients' quality-of-life (HRQoL) after three types of atrophic post-acne scar treatment, namely microneedling alone (MN) vs chemical peeling alone (CP) vs. a combination of microneedling and chemical peeling (MN + CP). Material and methods: A total of 120 patients were enrolled into the study following strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomized into the three treatment groups -- MN, CP (a combination of trichloroacetic acid, kojic acid and hydrogen peroxide), and MN + CP. According to a preapproved protocol, each patient underwent four treatment sessions, each spread 20 days apart. Both pre- and post-treatment clinical status (using the Goodman-Baron scale; two expert raters blinded to the treatment used) and patients' HRQoL (using the Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. Results: During the 5-month recruitment period, a total of 120 patients were approached and agreed to take part in the study (94 females -- 78.3% and 26 males) (mean age of 30.14 ±3.64 years; range: 18-45 years). Only in the MN + CP group there was a statistically significant improvement according to the G-B scale post-treatment (2.87 ±0.83 vs. 2.03 ±1.16 respectively; p = 0.0005). Patients in all three treatment groups experienced a statistically significant improvement in their HRQoL post-treatment (all p's < 0.05). Conclusions: A combination of microneedling and chemical peeling produces the best, objectively measured effects in the treatment of atrophic post-acne scars. All examined treatments, even if not producing a clinically significant treatment outcome, improve patients' HRQoL.
- Subjects
ACNE; CHEMICAL peel; DRY needling; SCARS; QUALITY of life
- Publication
Advances in Dermatology & Allergology / Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii, 2021, Vol 38, Issue 4, p629
- ISSN
1642-395X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5114/ada.2021.108913