We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
The interplay of metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease and viral hepatitis on liver disease severity: A large community‐based study in a viral endemic area.
- Authors
Huang, Chung‐Feng; Liang, Po‐Cheng; Tsai, Pei‐Chien; Wei, Yu‐Ju; Huang, Ching‐I; Wang, Chih‐Wen; Jang, Tyng‐Yuan; Yeh, Ming‐Lun; Hsu, Po‐Yao; Hsieh, Ming‐Yen; Lin, Yi‐Hung; Dai, Chia‐Yen; Chuang, Wan‐Long; Huang, Jee‐Fu; Yu, Ming‐Lung
- Abstract
Background and Aim: The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and its interplay with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in terms of liver disease severity is elusive. Methods: A mass surveillance program was conducted in a viral hepatitis endemic area. The objective was to identify MAFLD/non‐MAFLD subjects with advanced liver disease. Results: Two thousand two hundred and forty‐two (41.7%) of the 5378 subjects were identified as having MAFLD, and 375 (7.0%) had advanced liver disease. The proportions of anti‐HCV and HBsAg seropositivity were 19.3% and 9.7%, respectively. The proportions of advanced fibrosis in subjects with non‐viral hepatitis (NBNC), HBV and HCV infection were 2.8%, 5.7% and 23.4%, respectively. Subjects with MAFLD had a significantly higher proportion of advanced fibrosis (8.7% vs 5.7%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with advanced fibrosis included age (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8/3.7–6.0, P < 0.001), male sex (OR/CI: 1.3/1.0–1.7, P = 0.019), anti‐HCV seropositivity (OR/CI: 5.9/4.6–7.5, P = 0.019), MAFLD‐lean metabolic dysregulation (MS) (OR/CI: 2.6/1.3–5.2, P = 0.005; compared with the non‐MAFLD group) and MAFLD‐diabetes (OR/CI: 1.5/1.1–2.1, P = 0.008; compared with the non‐MAFLD group). MAFLD did not aggravate liver disease severity in patients with viral hepatitis. However, among NBNC subjects, factors associated with advanced liver disease included MAFLD‐lean MS group (OR/CI: 9.1/2.4–34.6, P = 0.001; compared with non‐MAFLD group) and MAFLD‐DM group (OR/CI: 2.0/1.2–3.2, P = 0.004; compared with non‐MAFLD group). Conclusions: MAFLD patients with diabetes and metabolic dysregulation had a higher risk of advanced liver disease. The effect was more significant in non‐viral hepatitis subjects in a community level.
- Subjects
FATTY liver; VIRAL hepatitis; LIVER diseases; VIRUS diseases; HEPATITIS C virus
- Publication
Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2024, Vol 39, Issue 1, p193
- ISSN
0815-9319
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/jgh.16363