We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Validation of goose liver fat measurement by QCT and CSE-MRI with biochemical extraction and pathology as reference.
- Authors
Xu, Li; Duanmu, Yangyang; Blake, Glen M.; Zhang, Chenxin; Zhang, Yong; Brown, Keenan; Wang, Xiaoqi; Wang, Peng; Zhou, Xingang; Zhang, Manling; Wang, Chao; Guo, Zhe; Guglielmi, Giuseppe; Cheng, Xiaoguang
- Abstract
<bold>Objectives: </bold>This study aimed to validate the accuracy and reliability of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) to assess hepatic steatosis.<bold>Methods: </bold>Twenty-two geese with a wide range of hepatic steatosis were collected. After QCT and CSE-MRI examinations, the liver of each goose was removed and samples were taken from the left lobe, upper and lower half of the right lobe for biochemical measurement and histology. Fat percentages by QCT and proton density fat fraction by MRI (MRI-PDFF) were measured within the sample regions of biochemical measurement and histology. The accuracy of QCT and MR measurements were assessed through Spearman correlation coefficients (r) and Passing and Bablok regression equations using biochemical measurement as the "gold standard".<bold>Results: </bold>Both QCT and MRI correlated highly with chemical extraction [r = 0.922 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.949 (p < 0.001) respectively]. Chemically extracted triglyceride was accurately predicted by both QCT liver fat percentages (Y = 0.6 + 0.866 × X) and by MRI-PDFF (Y = -1.8 + 0.773 × X).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>QCT and CSE-MRI measurements of goose liver fat were accurate and reliable compared with biochemical measurement.<bold>Key Points: </bold>• QCT and CSE-MRI can measure liver fat content accurately and reliably • Histological grading of hepatic steatosis has larger sampling variability • QCT and CSE-MRI have potential in the clinical setting.
- Subjects
COMPUTED tomography; LIVER diseases; FATTY degeneration; LIVER transplantation; LIVER cancer; ANIMAL experimentation; BIOLOGICAL models; COMPARATIVE studies; FATTY liver; LIVER; MAGNETIC resonance imaging; RESEARCH methodology; MEDICAL cooperation; POULTRY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH evaluation; RESEARCH funding; EVALUATION research
- Publication
European Radiology, 2018, Vol 28, Issue 5, p2003
- ISSN
0938-7994
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1007/s00330-017-5189-x