We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Supreme Court Upholds Ruling That Actual Knowledge of Imprudent Investments Is Required to Trigger ERISA Statute of Limitations.
- Abstract
The article discusses the court case Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S where in Christopher Sulyma, a former employee and participant in the defendant Intel Corporation's retirement plans, sued the company for imprudently investing retirement funds, which he alleged to constitute a violation of ERISA Section 1104.
- Subjects
APPELLATE courts; LIMITATION of actions; LEGAL judgments; EMPLOYEE Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; DEFINED benefit pension plans
- Publication
Benefits Quarterly, 2020, Vol 36, Issue 4, p59
- ISSN
8756-1263
- Publication type
Article