We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Continuous palliative sedation for patients with advanced cancer at a tertiary care cancer center.
- Authors
Prado, Bernard Lobato; Gomes, Diogo Bugano Diniz; Usón Júnior, Pedro Luiz Serrano; Taranto, Patricia; França, Monique Sedlmaier; Eiger, Daniel; Mariano, Rodrigo Coutinho; Hui, David; Del Giglio, Auro
- Abstract
Background: Palliative sedation (PS) is an intervention to treat refractory symptoms and to relieve suffering at the end of life. Its prevalence and practice patterns vary widely worldwide. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency, clinical indications and outcomes of PS in advanced cancer patients admitted to our tertiary comprehensive cancer center. Methods: We retrospectively studied the use of PS in advanced cancer patients who died between March 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2014. PS was defined as the use of continuous infusion of midazolam or neuroleptics for refractory symptoms in the end of life. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of our institution (project number 2481-15). Results: During the study period, 552 cancer patients died at the institution and 374 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Main reason for exclusion was death in the Intensive Care Unit. Among all included patients, 54.2% (n = 203) received PS. Patients who received PS as compared to those not sedated were younger (67.8 vs. 76.4 years-old, p< 0.001) and more likely to have a diagnosis of lung cancer (23% vs. 14%, p = 0.028). The most common indications for sedation were dyspnea (55%) and delirium (19.7%) and the most common drugs used were midazolam (52.7%) or midazolam and a neuroleptic (39.4%). Median initial midazolam infusion rate was 0.75 mg/h (interquartile range -- IQR - 0.6-1.5) and final rate was 1.5 mg/h (IQR 0.9-3.0). Patient survival (length of hospital stay from admission to death) of those who had PS was more than the double of those who did not (33.6 days vs 16 days, p < 0.001). The palliative care team was involved in the care of 12% (n = 25) of sedated patients. Conclusions: PS is a relatively common practice in the end-of-life of cancer patients at our hospital and it is not associated with shortening of hospital stay. Involvement of a dedicated palliative care team is strongly recommended if this procedure is being considered. Further research is needed to identify factors that may affect the frequency and outcomes associated with PS.
- Subjects
TREATMENT effectiveness; ANALYSIS of variance; ANESTHESIA; ANTIPSYCHOTIC agents; CANCER patients; CANCER treatment; CHI-squared test; CLINICAL medicine; DELIRIUM; DYSPNEA; LENGTH of stay in hospitals; INTENSIVE care units; LUNG tumors; MIDAZOLAM; PALLIATIVE treatment; SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry); SPECIALTY hospitals; KEY performance indicators (Management); RETROSPECTIVE studies; DATA analysis software; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; KAPLAN-Meier estimator; TERTIARY care; KRUSKAL-Wallis Test
- Publication
BMC Palliative Care, 2018, Vol 17, p1
- ISSN
1472-684X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1186/s12904-017-0264-2