We found a match
Your institution may have rights to this item. Sign in to continue.
- Title
Physiotherapists' compliance with ankle injury guidelines is different for patients with acute injuries and patients with functional instability: an observational study.
- Authors
Kooijman, Margit K.; Swinkels, Ilse C. S.; Veenhof, Cindy; Spreeuwenberg, Peter; Leemrijse, Chantal J.
- Abstract
Questions: What are the characteristics of patients with acute ankle injuries or functional instability of the ankle? Do physiotherapists treat these patients according to evidence-based guidelines? What are the determinants of adherence to the guidelines? Design: Observational study using multi-level analyses of data from the National Information Service for Allied Health Care in the Netherlands. This network continuously collects healthcare-related information on characteristics of patients and their referral, health problem, and treatment plan. Participants: 1413 patients treated for ankle injuries. Outcome measures: Adherence to the guidelines was measured using three quality indicators: number of sessions, interventions, and accomplished treatment goals. Results: Interventions and treatment goals were often aimed at the improvement of body functions, especially in patients with functional instability. Although not advised in the guidelines, manual manipulation was applied during treatment in 21% of the patients with functional instability. On average, patients with acute ankle injuries have a 38% chance of being treated according to the guidelines. Adherence can be explained partly by the duration of the complaint, whether the complaint is recurrent, the patient's age and the experience of the therapist, but it depends substantially on the therapist. Conclusion: There is some discrepancy between the guidelines and practice, especially regarding the interventions applied to patients with functional instability. However, there is large variation between therapists. The sooner a patient presents for treatment and the greater the experience of the physiotherapist with ankle injuries, the greater the likelihood that treatment will follow the guidelines.
- Subjects
NETHERLANDS; PHYSICAL therapists; WOUND care; ANKLE injury treatment; PHYSIOLOGICAL therapeutics; PATIENT compliance; MEDICAL care; JOINT hypermobility; PHYSICAL therapy; AGE distribution; ANKLE injuries; CONFIDENCE intervals; EMPLOYEES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; FORECASTING; INTENSIVE care nursing; MANIPULATION therapy; MEDICAL protocols; NOSOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC observation; HEALTH outcome assessment; STATISTICAL sampling; SPRAINS; STATISTICS; DECISION making in clinical medicine; DISEASE relapse; LOGISTIC regression analysis; DATA analysis; TREATMENT effectiveness; INTER-observer reliability; TREATMENT duration; DATA analysis software; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; THERAPEUTICS
- Publication
Journal of Physiotherapy (Australian Physiotherapy Association), 2011, Vol 57, Issue 1, p41
- ISSN
1836-9553
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70006-6